Foreword
by GM Lev Polugayevsky
|
|
PART I
|
|
BASIC
PRINCIPLES AND TASKS OF THE OPENING
|
|
1
|
Mobilization
of the Forces in the Opening
|
The scale of
relative piece values and its significance in the opening
|
|
Development of the
pieces and the role of the centre
|
|
The unpleasant
consequences of loss of tempi
|
|
Premature inclusion
of the heavy pieces in the play
|
|
The danger of
leaving the king in the centre
|
|
Diversions in the
opening
|
|
Harmony in the
development of the flanks
|
|
Excessive
prophylaxis
|
|
Advantageous
opening of the centre
|
|
Retribution for
routine play
|
|
Flexibility of
development in the opening
|
|
The advantage of the
first move and the initiative
|
|
Move order in the
opening
|
|
2
|
Active
Operations in the Opening
|
Combinations, early
attacks and counterattacks
|
|
The triumph of
tactics
|
|
Early opening
attacks
|
|
The castled
position as a target for attack in the opening
|
|
Pawn storms early
in the game
|
|
The attack on h7
|
|
Pawn weaknesses in
the castled position
|
|
Counterattack in
the opening
|
|
3
|
Basic
Spatial Factors
|
Occupation of the
centre
|
|
Opening up of the
centre
|
|
The art of
centralization
|
|
The demarcation
line of the board
|
|
The distinction
between the flanks
|
|
The Q-side as the
arena of opening play
|
|
Premature flank
operations
|
|
Against a flank
diversion — a counterblow in the centre
|
|
4
|
General
Opening Problems
|
Pawn weaknesses
|
|
Pawn chains and
their mobility
|
|
The blocking of
pawn chains
|
|
The coordination of
pieces and pawns at the start ofthe game
|
|
Coordination ofthe
forces in the opening
|
|
Isolation of part
of the forces
|
|
Coordination and
basic opening principles
|
|
Disuniting the
opponent’s flanks
|
|
Models of
harmonious piece coordination
|
|
PART II
|
|
THE DEVELOPMENT
OF OPENING THEORY
|
|
5
|
The
Connection of the Opening with the Later Stages of the Game
|
The opening as a
sum total of knowledge about the initial position
|
|
The choice of
strategic ‘weapon’
|
|
The realization of
an opening advantage in the middlegame
|
|
The plan of
accumulating positional advantages
|
|
Simplifying from
the opening into a complex endgame
|
|
6
|
Attack
during the Transition to the Middlegame
|
Attack as an
effective strategic means
|
|
Offensive in the
centre
|
|
Switching the
attack from the centre to the K-side
|
|
Switching the
attack to the Q-side
|
|
The preparation of
pawn breaks
|
|
Pawn storms on
opposite flanks
|
|
An attack on the
king is always the No.1 threat
|
|
Counterattacks and
defensive barriers
|
|
7
|
Dynamic
Attacks and the Tactical Struggle for the Initiative in Modern Opening
Systems
|
Sharp ways of
struggling for the initiative in the centre
|
|
The attainment of
manoeuvring freedom and the initiative at the cost of material sacrifices or
positional concessions
|
|
Dynamics of the
modern opening
|
|
Dynamic attacks in
the opening and during the transition to the middlegame
|
|
‘Shock’ central attacks
against the Sicilian
|
|
Sudden explosive
piece attacks
|
|
Switching the
weight ofthe attack from another target to the king
|
|
A broad tactical
offensive
|
|
The dominant role
of tactics in attack
|
|
Psychological
factors of dynamic attacks
|
|
The ‘brittleness’
of dynamic attacks
|
|
Dynamic
counterattacks
|
|
Dynamic seizing
ofthe initiative
|
|
Belief in defensive
resources
|
|
Under the
microscope of analysis
|
|
A necessary measure
of caution in active intentions
|
|
Attack as a playing
method
|
|
8
|
Opening
Principles in their Second Approximation
|
Dynamic play and a
new approach to opening principles
|
|
Minor piece
manoeuvres in the opening. Opening exchanges
|
|
Early development
of the heavy pieces
|
|
Delayed castling.
Leaving the king in the centre
|
|
The sacrifice of a
pawn in the opening
|
|
Queen against rook
and minor piece
|
|
Queen against three
minor pieces
|
|
Exchange sacrifices
in the opening
|
|
Rook for two minor
pieces
|
|
The sacrifice of a
minor piece in the opening
|
|
The tactical
destruction ofthe flanks in the opening
|
|
Seizure ofthe
centre from the flanks
|
|
Castling on
opposite sides
|
|
The double-edged
nature of pawn expansions
|
|
Tactical ways of
transforming the centre
|
|
Optimal plan or
best variation?
|
|
Opening ‘fashion’
and the origin of new variations
| |
9
|
Modern
Strategic Problems of Opening Struggle for the Centre
|
New methods of
opening struggle for the initiative
|
|
Positions of
dynamic balance
|
|
Typical pawn
structures in the centre
|
|
Pawn structures and
the inner content of the opening struggle
|
|
Tense structures in
the centre
|
|
Undetermined
structures in the centre
|
|
Flexible opening
structures
|
|
‘Cramped’ positions
|
|
Index
of Players
|
Minggu, 10 Juni 2012
Plan Like a GRANDMASTER – Alexei Suetin
Langganan:
Posting Komentar (Atom)
Tidak ada komentar:
Posting Komentar